A contractor-focused breakdown of when to use each product, what they cost relative to each other, and where each performs best.
Fiberglass and mineral wool are the two dominant batt insulation formats in residential and light commercial construction. Both work. Both meet code. The question is which one is right for a specific assembly, budget, and building type.
| Factor | Fiberglass Batts | Mineral Wool (Rockwool) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Lower — typically 20–40% less per bag | Higher upfront cost |
| R-Value per inch | ~R-3.1 to R-3.7 | ~R-3.7 to R-4.2 |
| Fire resistance | Melts at high temp; non-combustible but not fire-rated | Non-combustible up to ~2,150°F; used in fire-rated assemblies |
| Moisture resistance | Can retain moisture; requires vapor control | Hydrophobic — repels water, dries quickly |
| Sound control (STC) | Moderate | Superior — preferred for party walls and floor-ceiling assemblies |
| Installation | Lighter, easier to handle | Denser, more rigid; holds shape better in cavities |
| Eco profile | 30–40% recycled glass content | 70–75% recycled stone/slag content |
Fiberglass batts are the right call for most standard residential projects where cost control matters and there are no special fire, sound, or moisture requirements. They cover the vast majority of wall, floor, and attic applications at a lower material cost.
Mineral wool earns its higher price tag in specific applications where its fire resistance, moisture performance, or sound control are worth the premium.
Fiberglass: R-11, R-13, R-15, R-19, R-21, R-30, R-38, R-49 — kraft-faced and unfaced, standard and high-density grades, all standard widths (15" and 23").
Mineral wool: AFB (Acoustic Fire Batt), SAFB (Semi-Rigid), R-15, R-23, R-30. Available in 2×4, 2×6, and wider applications.
Tell us your assembly type, R-value target, and quantity — we'll recommend the right product and get you a same-day quote.
Start a Quote